However, integrating them into a rack poses some challenges.
#Mac mini 2011 server mac#
I’m not going to point any fingers here, but I will say there are a few vendors selling “upgraded” Mac Minis in excess of $10k.Mac® mini computers make sweet servers for most applications.
#Mac mini 2011 server software#
Or if you’re using JRiver for your music server software you can use the very capable JRemote iPad app. Having said that, why not use screen sharing from your laptop in your listening chair and not have a video monitor hooked up at all, then you have the ultimate remote control! (still no volume control for native DSD playback however). This is very different from an SACD player that has video circuitry in it, where the SACD player is performing the DAC (digital to analog) conversion internally and therefore has analog circuitry that can in fact be effected by video circuitry and therefore the possibility of sonic degradation exists. Speaking of monitors, the video circuitry in your Mac Mini won’t effect sound quality at all. You could also use Thunderbolt but I see no benefit over Firewire 800 and two possible detriments, the first being high cost and the second being the possibility of having to share it with a monitor. So put your external drives on the Mac Mini’s Firewire 800 bus, which is latent anyway if your Mac Mini is a dedicated music server.
#Mac mini 2011 server full#
And… if you have a USB DAC, you may want to keep your hard drives off the USB bus as it will already have it’s hands full if playing 5.6 MHz DSD or 392 KHz/24 bit PCM files. Not toslink or digital coax, both of which are the legacy of Home Theatre audio. Which brings to mind the fifth requirement, a USB DAC. Noisy to the point where it can effect that “bit perfect” pass-off you’re looking for. And, ethernet is a noisy, high-traffic, and relatively slow cabling solution anyway. Go fan-less! (What are the best external hard drives for a music server?) Which unfortunately precludes all NAS (Network Attached Storage) devices. And all the Mac Mini is responsible for is digital file delivery… you’ve got an external DAC, right?įourth, hard drives can make a difference, especially for music with soft passages. If it’s “bit-perfect” than the job is done and it ends there. I’m all about high quality power supplies in amplification circuits, but EMI (electromagnetic induction) simply doesn’t effect the sound quality of digital circuitry. It doesn’t require a physics degree to grasp this, but if you have one you will immediately realize that the vendors selling upgraded power supplies for the Mac Mini to improve sound quality are claiming to defy the most basic laws of physics. Sonic benefits claimed my the vendors of upgraded power supplies are borderline fraudulent. Third, your power supply doesn’t make a hill of beans of difference to sound quality. In other words, you won’t hear a sonic difference due to insufficient RAM, but if a song suddenly stops playing then catches up, you need more RAM to buffer your files. You may run into occasional buffering issues with these files, but it’s not insidious to sound quality, more glitchy in nature. The most demanding requirements will be playing 5.6 MHz DSD files and 392 KHz/24 bit PCM files. Second, RAM could make a difference depending on your hard drives. Why?… Remember, this is a dedicated computer so you are only running your high definition audio software on it, right? This software uses less than 10% of the processing power any relatively new Mac Mini offers. Anything in the last few years is plenty. So a few thoughts after listening to the Mac Mini’s so far…įirst off processing power is virtually irrelevant to sound quality. And I subsequently purchased a new one for Canada. So a friend gave me a not-so-old Mac Mini and it’s now my Music Server on Maui. If the volume control in iTunes changes the volume on your system, you’ve been PCMed (Why audiophiles don’t get to have a remote control…).īut the obvious and most ubiquitous choice for a dedicated computer as a music server is a Mac Mini.
And native DSD playback isn’t possible with such iTunes-structured programs, that are PCM based. So I’m also not a fan of claimed audiophile software that uses iTunes as the user interface. And trust me, if there’s a way to screw up your audio quality, iTunes will find it. All the less so for the limitations of OS X for handling high definition digital audio.
0 kommentar(er)
